Reviews for Cloning the Future of Medical Science
- Posted by Skeetshootingal (1)
Created on 10-05-2008
Reviews: 5 
Comments: 0 
Views: 951
Cloning is the future of medical science
Cloning is one of the most controversial subjects and will be even more as time goes on. Cloning is the future of medical science and it will one day save the lives of many people. With success, scientists will be able to clone humans and use their organs people who need organ transplants. People will be able to clone their loved ones and clone thier pets. Ranchers will be able to clone their prize winning bulls, and clone cattle for beef.
This breakthrough sounds good in a lot of ways but many people believe it is morally wrong and that only God should create animals. People in need of organ transplants will die because it is their time to go. If it isn't time, then an organ from an uncloned donor will be given to them.
Dolly was the first cloned sheep. She lived to be 7 years old when she was put to sleep. She h....
read more
Reviews for Cloning the Future of Medical Science
-
- Luckycharms
- 48 reviews since
- Aug 29, 2008
Only God should give life and take life away. Cloning will end in distaster. Even if humans are in a vegetative state and have never been able to view the world, they still have thoughts, their brains still work. It's wrong and it is murder.
- 0
-
- 0
-
-
- Jonboy1785
- 26 reviews since
- Sep 3, 2008
Medical science is all about researching to save the lives of people and to help them be healthy. Not to mention live life to its fullest. However, it is wrong to clone a human just for the organs. Especially if they are created and they do not know they are clones. It is sort of like cattle. Do they know they are going to be killed in order to feed us and provide money? On the other hand, is a life of an un-cloned human more important than one that is cloned?
- 0
-
- 0
-
-
- Librazoe
- 68 reviews since
- Jul 30, 2008
As an animal lover myself, if cloning was affordable, I would probably be open to the idea of cloning my pet. Just to keep a part of them alive. It wouldn't be the same pet but it would be keeping the memory alive. It's not like they are going to harvest organs from an animal.
- 0
-
- 0
-
-
- Jasmine4lakshmi
- 166 reviews since
- Jul 9, 2008
Considering the fact that so many people are on a waiting list for an organ transplant, cloning might be a good option. Maybe it is wrong but I would be willing to do anything to save the life of someone I really loved.
- 0
-
- 0
-
-
- Skeetshootingal
- 26 reviews since
- Sep 12, 2008
Personally, I can't picture the idea of taking vital organs from someone we created just for that purpose. Each clone was once a child and in my eyes that is the same as abortion.
- 0
-
- 0
-
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
){kind=link}